High Order Thinking Skills in One of the Private Elementary Schools in Sleman Yogyakarta District (Case Study)

Apri Damai Sagita Krissandi1, Brigitta Erlita Tri Anggadewi2 and Sangsang Lusiani Supriyanti3
1apridamai@gmail.com, 2erlita.pgsd@gmail.com, 3sangsanglusiani@gmail.com
1,2,3Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Yogyakarta
DOI: 10.24071/seadr.2019.22

Abstract: This study aims to find out: (1) whether the teacher has compiled a thematic learning plan that contains indicators of high-level thinking skills; (2) whether the teacher has implemented learning activities that lead to high-level thinking skills; and (3) whether the implementation of class assessment at midterm assessments has led to the measurement of high-level thinking skills. This research is a qualitative research with case study research design. The subjects of this study were the fifth grade teachers who arranged the implementation of learning planning and applied the implementation of learning. Data were collected using questionnaire, observation, interview, and documentation techniques. The results of the study show that: (1) the lesson plan prepared by the teacher already contains indicators of high-level thinking skills; (2) the teacher is able to apply learning activities that contain high-level thinking skills; (3) class assessment in the form of PTS (Mid Semester Assessment) leads to the measurement of high-level thinking skills.

Keywords: learning implementation plan (RPP), Learning Implementation, High-level thinking skills, Implementation of class assessment

Graphical abstract

Download the full-size graphical abstract

Full Text

Full text PDF

References

  1. Amelia, M. A. (2016). Analisis soal tes hasil belajar High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Matematika Materi Pecahan untuk Kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian, 20(2).
  2. Annuuru, T. A., Johan, R. C., & Ali, M. (2017).  Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Dalam Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Treffinger, 3, 136-144.
  3. Arikunto, S. (2007).  Evaluasi program pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  4. Gunawan, I. (2016). Metode penelitian kualitatif teori dan praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  5. Julia, A. I., & Safari, I. (2017). Prosiding Seminar Nasional. Sumedang.
  6. Jumiati, J. (2016). IPA dan pembelajaran berpikir tingkat tinggi (Telaah Buku Siswa MI/SD Kelas VI Tema 1, Karya Afriki, dkk). Muallimuna: Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 2(1), 17-26.
  7. Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 konsep & penerapan. Surabaya: Kata Pena.
  8. Majid, A. (2014). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 kajian teoritis dan praktis. Bandung: Interes Media.
  9. Matondang, Z. (2009). Validitas dan reliabilitas suatu instrumen penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa, 6(1), 87-97.
  10. Mitri, H. (2016). Analisis pembelajaran keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi pada mata pelajaran Ekonomi di SMA N 8 Yogyakarta. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
  11. Mufidah, S., & Wijaya, A. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat realistik pada materi aritmatika soal untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa SMP Kelas VII. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6, 11-8.
  12. Mulyadi, M., & Usman, A. (2013). Implementasi pembelajaran tematik terpadu berbasis lingkungan untuk perolehan kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi.
  13. Mulyasa, Iskandar, & Aryani. (2016). Revolusi dan Inovasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  14. Ningsih, A. (2018). Bab II landasan teori.
  15. Prastowo, A. (2015). Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) tematik terpadu. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  16. Pujihastuti, I. (2010). Prinsip penulisan kuesioner penelitian. CEFARS: Jurnal Agribisnis dan Pengembangan Wilayah, 2(1), 43-56.
  17. Raharjo, M. (2010). Triangulasi dalam penelitian kualitatif.
  18. Rohim, A, Ridho, B. A., & Julian, S. G. (2016). Belajar dan pembelajaran di abad 21. Skripsi. FIP. Kurikulum dan Teknologi Pendidikan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
  19. Rusman. (2017). Belajar dan pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Kharisma Utama.
  20. Saputra, H. (2016). Pengembangan mutu pendidikan menuju era global. Bandung: CV Smile’s Indonesia Institute.
  21. Setyowati, S. (2011). Jenis dan desain penelitian.
  22. Siregar, S. (2010). Statistika deskriptif untuk penelitian dilengkapi perhitungan manual dan aplikasi SPSS Versi 17. Jakarta: Rajawali pers.
  23. Sisi. (2017). Panduan Bagaimana pendidik dapat menulis soal yang berkriteria untuk berpikir tingkat tinggi.
  24. Sunarti, & Rahmawati, S. (2014). Penilaian kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.
  25. Triwiyarto, U. (2015). Studi kasus tentang penyebab kenakalan remaja.
  26. Wardani, A. K. (2013). Bab III metode penelitia.
  27. Wijaya, S., & Nyoto. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan abad 21 sebagai pengembanagan sumber daya manusia di era global. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 4-16.
  28. Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad Ke-2.

Metrics and Citations

High Order Thinking Skills in One of the Private Elementary Schools in Sleman Yogyakarta District (Case Study)

Krissandi, A. D. S., Anggadewi, B. E. T., & Supriyanti, S. L. (2020). High Order Thinking Skills in One of the Private Elementary Schools in Sleman Yogyakarta District (Case Study). In Y. D. Kristanto, A. H. Panuluh, B. Utomo, & P. Angelina (Eds.), Companion Proceedings of the 7th South East Asia Design Research International Conference (SEADRIC 2019) (pp. 155–164). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press. doi: 10.24071/seadr.2019.22


Krissandi, Apri Damai Sagita, et al. “High Order Thinking Skills in One of the Private Elementary Schools in Sleman Yogyakarta District (Case Study).” Companion Proceedings of the 7th South East Asia Design Research International Conference (SEADRIC 2019), edited by Yosep Dwi Kristanto et al., Sanata Dharma University Press, Yogyakarta, 2020, pp. 155–164.


Krissandi, Apri Damai Sagita, Brigitta Erlita Tri Anggadewi, and Sangsang Lusiani Supriyanti. “High Order Thinking Skills in One of the Private Elementary Schools in Sleman Yogyakarta District (Case Study).” In Companion Proceedings of the 7th South East Asia Design Research International Conference (SEADRIC 2019), edited by Yosep Dwi Kristanto, Albertus Hariwangsa Panuluh, Beni Utomo, and Patricia Angelina, 155–164. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24071/seadr.2019.22.


Copyright information

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

© The Author(s) 2020